The judge ruled that Apple was not a monopoly and that its success was not illegal
Apple removes the popular game Fortnite from the App Store because the developer has included a link for its in-app payment platform
The judge wrote in a statement: “The court conceals sensitive information from Apple’s anti-corruption law and obstructs consumer choices.” Combined with Apple’s first anti-Semitism violations, these anti-corruption laws are anti-incompetent and a national solution to eliminate them. Provisions are guaranteed. “On the other hand,” she said, “given the probationary record, the court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopoly under federal or state anti-religious laws.”
“We are delighted with the court’s decision and consider this a great victory for Apple,” said Kate Adams, Apple’s general counsel.
Epic general manager Tim Swayway said on his Twitter account that Epic was “fighting.” “Today’s verdict is not a victory for developers or consumers,” he added. After passing Fortnite’s savings, Epic will return to the iOS App Store to offer in-app payment in Apple’s in-app fair competition. For customers. “
Epic Request Allowing the app store to be installed side by side
Paul Swanson, a Denver-based anti-faith lawyer from Holland and Hart LLP, analyzed the legal outcome: We are getting a slightly mixed answer. I think the main take is ‘success is not illegal’ and it is not illegal for a garden like Apple to compete with other digital mobile game marketing coordinators.
In her decision, Judge Rogers wrote: “The court is concerned that the fair market for digital mobile gaming transactions here is not in the general game, but in connection with Apple’s own internal operating systems and the app store.” “The mobile gaming market itself is a $ 100 billion industry,” she said. The size of this market explains the purpose of Epic Games to bring this action. Introducing all other video game markets, the mobile gaming market was the next target for Epic Games and he sees Apple as an obstacle.
Epic also asked the judge to force Apple to allow iPhone users to install the app store on the iPhone, but Apple cited the reason for not doing so. The judge ruled in favor of Apple.