The judge ruled that Apple’s success and that the garden was not illegal

Judge Ivan Gonzalez Rogers ruled today in the case of Epic v Apple with an 185-page limit. Basis Wall Street Journal, The judge issued an injunction barring Apple developers from posting a link or transferring to consumers how to make payments to other platforms outside the Apple system. In other words, Judge Ivon Gonzalez Rogers says developers can refer their customers to other in-app payment platforms and eliminate Apple’s in-app payment system, which takes up to 30% of in-app revenue.

The judge ruled that Apple was not a monopoly and that its success was not illegal

Apple has added a link to the in-app payment platform alongside Apple’s own in-app payment platform, removing Apple Epic and the popular Fortnite game from the App Store. The technology company violated Apple’s rules for forcing developers to use Apple’s in-app system to get a 30% discount. Epic went on to say that the judge’s decision against Apple was released today.

The judge wrote in a statement: “The court conceals sensitive information from Apple’s anti-corruption law and obstructs consumer choices.” Combined with Apple’s first anti-Semitism violations, these anti-corruption laws are anti-incompetent and a national solution to eliminate them. Provisions are guaranteed. “On the other hand,” she said, “given the probationary record, the court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopoly under federal or state anti-religious laws.”

In a strong comment “Apple should be happy,” the judge said. “Success is not illegal.” And how successful was the $ 64 billion app store by 2020. The tech giants issued a statement after the verdict and said: We are committed to making it an app store. A safe and secure marketplace that supports a prosperous developer community and more than 2.1 million jobs in the United States and where the rules apply equally to all.

“We are delighted with the court’s decision and consider this a great victory for Apple,” said Kate Adams, Apple’s general counsel.

Epic general manager Tim Swayway said on his Twitter account that Epic was “fighting.” “Today’s verdict is not a victory for developers or consumers,” he added. After passing Fortnite’s savings, Epic will return to the iOS App Store to offer in-app payment in Apple’s in-app fair competition. For customers. “

Epic Request Allowing the app store to be installed side by side

Paul Swanson, a Denver-based anti-faith lawyer from Holland and Hart LLP, analyzed the legal outcome: We are getting a slightly mixed answer. I think the main take is ‘success is not illegal’ and it is not illegal for a garden like Apple to compete with other digital mobile game marketing coordinators.

In her decision, Judge Rogers wrote: “The court is concerned that the fair market for digital mobile gaming transactions here is not in the general game, but in connection with Apple’s own internal operating systems and the app store.” “The mobile gaming market itself is a $ 100 billion industry,” she said. The size of this market explains the purpose of Epic Games to bring this action. Introducing all other video game markets, the mobile gaming market was the next target for Epic Games and he sees Apple as an obstacle.

Epic also asked the judge to force Apple to allow iPhone users to install the app store on the iPhone, but Apple cited the reason for not doing so. The judge ruled in favor of Apple.

Leave a Comment